Timeline for straight python alternative to ansible
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25 at 8:48 | comment | converted from answer | chase | I personally used Fabric and Attune for writing in Python language. | |
| Feb 13, 2021 at 22:52 | vote | accept | Mike | ||
| Feb 12, 2021 at 21:40 | comment | added | again | Better use your own module or run your scripts over ansible. You will enjoy both flavor simultaneously | |
| Feb 11, 2021 at 14:44 | answer | added | eradman | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 19, 2020 at 19:29 | comment | added | LLlAMnYP | Wouldn't writing your own modules be the way to express your wishes in straight python? | |
| Jun 16, 2020 at 0:54 | comment | added | Zeitounator | fabric is straight python but I'm not sure it passes the "preserve some of those nice things from ansible" threshold. | |
| May 28, 2020 at 21:46 | comment | added | Mike | @BruceBecker Yeah, either that or some combination where you use an imperative language to build up the "this is the state I want" data structure. | |
| May 27, 2020 at 9:31 | comment | added | Bruce Becker | The closest I could come to a suggestion that respects your "straight python" requirement was pulumi. However, that doesn't remove the need for configuration management... | |
| May 27, 2020 at 9:24 | comment | added | Bruce Becker | It sounds like you would prefer something with an imperative format, rather than the declarative interface that Ansible give you. Is this correct? | |
| May 26, 2020 at 22:10 | review | First posts | |||
| May 27, 2020 at 5:20 | |||||
| May 26, 2020 at 22:07 | history | asked | Mike | CC BY-SA 4.0 |