I see the following description in the repository of kubernetes the hard way:
Kubernetes The Hard Way is optimized for learning, which means taking the long route to ensure you understand each task required to bootstrap a Kubernetes cluster. The results of this tutorial should not be viewed as production ready, and may receive limited support from the community, but don't let that stop you from learning!
But when I create the same cluster with the two alternatives I don't see the differences in between the two clusters. The end result of the two of them is the same besides the fact that with Kubeadm I have to install it in the corresponding nodes to be able to use it, and in many cases commands like "init" made a lot of things automatically.
I understand that Kubernetes the hard way is longer, with purpose of education and a lot manual steps. But I don't understand why it is not production ready?
Does anyone knows which are the differences in between a kubernetes cluster generated with kubeadm and the steps followed by Kubernetes the hard way?
Please don't consider this as a preference of one method on top of another, is just to understand a bit more of possible differences of what I learnt with the kubernetes the hard way and a cluster generated with kubeadm.