0

We're seeing HUGE differences between Windows app service plan usage and Linux app service plan usage, when both apps are idle.

The difference is circa 300mb, which when we're talking a few app deployed to it, would equal a (few) different pricing bands, and we would be much better off using windows - which feels like a step backwards.

Am I doing something wrong? They're just vanilla app services, running on .net 6 apps. (Even Tried .net7 apps)

Self-Contained, targeting windows-64 & Linux-64 respectively

Linux App Service Plan

Windows App Service Plan

Improve this question
4
  • I've noticed the same thing and haven't been able to find any documentation around it. My guess is that this is the nature of Linux containers, where each app instance runs a container instance in Linux and that is heavy compared to running just a standalone Windows process.
    – Noah Stahl
    Dec 7, 2022 at 16:00
  • I am seeing this as well. Have either of you been able to determine a cause or fix for this.
    – Matt M
    Jul 6 at 21:57
  • Any update on this problem? I have same situation here. On windows plan application is using 60MB and on Linux it goes over 1.2 GB.
    – Sashus
    Sep 27 at 13:20
  • Nope - best a ticket logged with MS I think (I mean you can provide your own image which may fix it..)
    – Stuart.Sklinar
    Sep 27 at 15:40

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.