3

On learning about integrating Sonarqube to CI/CD pipeline, I came across the Sonarqube Jenkins plugin which most of the online blogs recommends.

After configuring it, I realized that the working is the same as that of running the sonar-scanner through the command line using below command.

sonar-scanner.bat -D"sonar.projectKey=test" -D"sonar.sources=." -D"sonar.host.url=http://localhost:9000" -D"sonar.login=erwerwerwerwer"

Same is applicable for any tool, as most can be executed through command line.

So I am confused about,

what's the advantage of using a plugin over just running the tools as windows batch command in Jenkins build step.?

1

1 Answer 1

2

Any CI/CD plugin can ultimately be scripted. However, using plugins gives you better centralized control.

Consider the following scenario: Your SonarQube server location has to move to a new location.

If you are using a script like the example you provided above, you would need to manually update every script. This process is error prone as you may miss a script or worse, type the wrong address. Instead, if you are using a plugin you can update the server location once and be done.

2
  • If I move the server , the plug-in requires same amount of rework as with plug-in. For instance, pointing to new sonarqube-scanner location and all. Ya if I choose automatic installation then your answer is correct.
    – PDHide
    Jul 15, 2019 at 14:44
  • 2
    @PDHide: You are correct if you have one build pipeline. But imagine how this will scale if you had 5, 15, 100 pipelines. One global configuration can save a lot of time in this type of setup. Jul 15, 2019 at 14:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.